ZBrain
Log in
Book a demo
Agents Incident Documentation Generator Agent

Incident Documentation Generator Agent

Automates the generation of detailed incident reports, ensuring accurate documentation of IT issues, resolutions, and impact for audits and future reference.

About the Agent

The Incident Documentation Generator Agent automates the creation of comprehensive reports for IT incidents, streamlining the documentation process. Leveraging GenAI, this agent gathers and organizes crucial information about each incident, including the issue’s nature, resolution steps, and its impact on the organization. It ensures that every incident is thoroughly documented, creating a clear, consistent record for audits, future reference, and post-incident analysis. By automating the report generation, this agent significantly reduces the time and effort required to produce accurate documentation while ensuring that no important details are missed. This enhances incident tracking, ensures compliance with audit requirements, and minimizes manual documentation tasks.

The agent integrates smoothly with existing IT systems, enabling automatic data collection from incident management platforms and syncing with current workflows. This seamless integration ensures that documentation is generated as incidents are resolved in real-time, maintaining accuracy and timeliness. Additionally, the agent features a human feedback loop that allows IT teams to provide input on report structure, content accuracy, and improvement areas. This feedback ensures continuous refinement of the agent’s capabilities, enhancing the quality of incident reports and ensuring that the documentation evolves with the organization’s changing needs.

Accuracy
TBD

Speed
TBD

Input Data Set

Sample of data set required for Incident Documentation Generator Agent:

Incident IDIncident TypeAffected SystemIncident DateResolution DateSeverityStatusIncident DescriptionResolution StepsImpact
INC-20241012-001Server CrashSRV-FINANCE012024-10-12 09:002024-10-12 11:30CriticalResolvedServer CPU overload during financial report generation.Rebalanced workloads, optimized SQL queries, upgraded memory.Delayed end-of-day financial reporting by 2 hours.
INC-20241010-002Network OutageSRV-WEB012024-10-10 14:002024-10-10 15:45MajorResolvedNetwork interface malfunction caused loss of connectivity.Replaced network interface card, rerouted traffic.Website down for 1.5 hours, potential loss of customer traffic.
INC-20241009-003Database FailureSRV-DB012024-10-09 17:002024-10-09 18:30HighResolvedDatabase crashed due to out-of-memory error.Restarted database, increased memory allocation, implemented memory optimization.Minor delay in internal operations, no external impact.
INC-20241008-004Disk FailureSRV-BACKUP012024-10-08 10:002024-10-08 13:00CriticalResolvedDisk failure caused backup job to fail.Replaced disk, reran backup jobs.Risk of data loss mitigated, backup successfully completed.
INC-20241007-005Security BreachSRV-EMAIL012024-10-07 03:002024-10-07 08:30CriticalResolvedUnauthorized access detected in the email server.Blocked unauthorized IP, implemented stricter firewall rules, performed security audit.No data was compromised, security protocols updated.

Deliverable Example

Sample output delivered by the Incident Documentation Generator Agent:

Incident Documentation Report


Incident Summary


    

  • Incident ID: INC-20241012-001
    • 

  • Incident Type: Server Crash
    • 

  • Severity: Critical
    • 

  • Status: Resolved
    • 

  • Affected System: SRV-FINANCE01 (Finance Department Server)
    • 

  • Incident Date: 2024-10-12 09:00 AM
    • 

  • Resolution Date: 2024-10-12 11:30 AM
    • 

  • Total Downtime: 2 hours 30 minutes
    • 





Incident Description


Nature of the Incident:


At 09:00 AM on 2024-10-12, SRV-FINANCE01 experienced a critical failure due to CPU overload while processing financial reports for the end-of-day reconciliation. This overload caused the server to crash, disrupting the generation of time-sensitive financial data for the Finance Department.


SRV-FINANCE01 is a mission-critical server responsible for handling the organization’s financial transactions and daily reconciliations. The server crashed due to simultaneous resource-intensive jobs being executed, including complex SQL queries for report generation and database reconciliation tasks.


Symptoms:


    

  • High CPU Usage: The CPU load on SRV-FINANCE01 exceeded 100% for over 30 minutes, causing the system to crash.
    • 

  • Sluggish System Performance: Prior to the crash, the system exhibited signs of performance degradation, with slow response times for database queries.
    • 

  • Unresponsive Services: Key financial applications hosted on the server became unresponsive, affecting users in the Finance Department.
    • 



Logs:


System logs from 08:45 AM to 09:00 AM showed increased CPU activity related to batch processing jobs:
[2024-10-12 08:45:00] CPU usage at 95%, SQL queries initiated for end-of-day reconciliation. 
[2024-10-12 08:50:00] CPU usage at 98%, multiple database reconciliation jobs running. 
[2024-10-12 08:55:00] CPU usage at 100%, memory allocation nearing threshold. 
[2024-10-12 09:00:00] System crash, services unresponsive, CPU usage at 105%.




Resolution Steps


Immediate Actions Taken:


    

  1. 

    Workload Redistribution: 
    

      

    • IT staff manually offloaded non-critical batch processing tasks to the backup server, SRV-FINANCE-BKP01, to reduce the load on the primary server.
      • 

    

    2. 

  2. 

    SQL Query Optimization: 
    

      

    • The database administrator identified inefficient SQL queries contributing to the high CPU usage. These queries were optimized to reduce the load on the server by implementing query caching and batch processing optimizations.
      • 

    

    3. 

  3. 

    Memory Audit:
    

      

    • A memory usage audit was conducted to determine if memory-related processes were contributing to the overload. No significant memory leaks were found, but optimization was recommended for the future.
      • 

    

    4. 

  4. 

    Server Reboot and Monitoring:
    

      

    • The server was rebooted at 09:45 AM. After the reboot, continuous monitoring was enabled to track CPU usage and prevent future overloads.
      • 

    

    5. 

  5. 

    Upgrade of System Resources:
    

      

    • The server’s memory was upgraded from 256GB to 512GB to accommodate future resource demands, particularly during peak financial processing periods.
      • 

    

    6. 





Root Cause Analysis


Summary of Findings:


    

  • 

    The incident was caused by concurrent resource-intensive jobs running on SRV-FINANCE01, including:
    

      

    • End-of-day financial report generation.
      • 

    • Database reconciliation tasks, which involve fetching large datasets and performing complex calculations.
      • 

    

    • 

  • 

    CPU overload occurred because these jobs were not properly scheduled, resulting in multiple high-load tasks running simultaneously. The server was unable to handle the combined workload, leading to a system crash.
    

    • 



Contributing Factors:


    

  1. 

    Job Scheduling Conflict:
    

      

    • Multiple jobs were initiated without considering resource contention. This caused the server to attempt to process multiple high-priority tasks at the same time, overloading the CPU.
      • 

    

    2. 

  2. 

    Inefficient SQL Queries:
    

      

    • SQL queries used for data reconciliation were not optimized. They fetched large datasets from the database, further straining the system’s CPU.
      • 

    

    3. 

  3. 

    Insufficient Resource Allocation:
    

      

    • The server's initial configuration (256GB RAM) was insufficient to handle peak load periods, particularly when running complex jobs during financial reporting periods.
      • 

    

    4. 





Business Impact


    

  • 

    Delayed End-of-Day Financial Reporting: The Finance Department was unable to generate end-of-day financial reports for the CFO’s office on time. The reports were delayed by approximately 2 hours, resulting in minor disruptions in the Finance Department's workflow.
    

    • 

  • 

    Potential for Regulatory Compliance Issues: 
    

      

    • The delayed reporting could have impacted compliance with regulatory requirements, as some financial reports are time-sensitive. However, due to the quick resolution, no compliance breaches occurred.
      • 

    

    • 

  • 

    Financial Impact: 
    

      

    • While there was no direct financial loss, the delay in reporting could have resulted in late penalties if not addressed promptly. The resolution within 2.5 hours helped avoid any major repercussions.
      • 

    

    • 





Recommendations for Future Prevention


1. Implement Job Scheduling Optimization


    

  • Introduce automated job scheduling that prioritizes high-load tasks and staggers them to avoid resource contention. Ensure that resource-intensive jobs, such as report generation and database reconciliation, are scheduled during low-traffic periods.
    • 



2. Horizontal Scaling


    

  • Introduce horizontal scaling to distribute the workload across multiple servers during peak financial periods. This will prevent any single server from being overloaded with concurrent high-demand jobs.
    • 



3. Optimize Database Queries


    

  • Review and optimize SQL queries used in the reconciliation process. Introduce query caching, indexing, and partitioning to reduce the computational load on the server.
    • 



4. Increase System Resource Allocation


    

  • Increase memory allocation on SRV-FINANCE01 to handle peak workloads. The server should have at least 512GB of RAM and additional CPU resources to ensure high availability and avoid overload.
    • 



5. Implement Continuous Monitoring and Alerts


    

  • Use real-time monitoring tools to track CPU usage, memory usage, and job execution times. Set up automated alerts that notify the IT team if any server approaches 90% CPU utilization, allowing for preemptive action.
    • 





Post-Incident Follow-Up


Audit and Review:


    

  • A post-incident audit will be conducted on 2024-10-14 to review the effectiveness of the resolution steps and ensure no further issues arise from the CPU overload incident.
    • 



Action Items:


    

  1. Conduct a review of all job scheduling and database queries used by the Finance Department.
    2. 

  2. Report findings to the IT Infrastructure Team.
    3. 

  3. Schedule a follow-up meeting with the CFO’s office to review the incident's impact on financial reporting.
    4. 





Key Contacts


    

  • Incident Owner: Dwayne Kashpakov (IT Operations Lead)
    • 

  • Database Administrator: Marry Smith (DBA Team)
    • 

  • System Administrator: Robert Saquel (Infrastructure Team)
    • 

  • Finance Department Contact: Sarah Gomez (CFO’s Office)
    • 





Report Generated by:


    

  • Incident Documentation Generator Agent
    • 

  • Agent Version: v4.0
    • 

  • Date Generated: 2024-10-12
    •

Related Agents

SLA Compliance Monitoring Agent

Automates the monitoring of Service Level Agreements (SLAs), ensuring that IT services meet agreed-upon performance metrics and alerting teams when SLAs are breached.

Code Documentation Generator Agent

Automatically generates detailed code documentation from the source code, ensuring that developers have access to accurate and up-to-date documentation.

Network Downtime Alert Agent

Monitors network performance and automatically sends alerts when downtime or performance degradation is detected.

Ticket Escalation Recommendation Agent

Analyzes ticket severity and urgency, automatically recommending escalation paths to ensure that high-priority issues are handled by the appropriate teams.

IT Self-Service Portal Agent

Automates the management and optimization of self-service IT portals, ensuring that users can resolve common issues without needing direct IT support intervention.

Server Performance Alert Agent

Monitors server performance in real time, generating alerts when server resources are strained or performance degrades.