ZBrain Security Questionnaire Automation Agent empowers organizations to respond instantly and accurately to IT security questionnaires. Leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) and a structured security knowledge base, the agent intelligently interprets, classifies, and retrieves policy-backed answers for every security query, minimizing manual workload, accelerating security assessments, and enhancing compliance with evolving security standards.
IT security teams regularly receive questionnaires from clients, partners, and auditors, each demanding detailed, domain-specific information on policies, controls, and safeguards. Manual handling involves navigating fragmented documentation and inconsistent sources, which can be slow and error-prone, leading to delays, missed requirements, and compliance risks. As security reviews grow in scale and complexity, these approaches lead to higher operational overhead, delayed stakeholder responses, and risk of audit failures and non-compliance.
ZBrain Security Questionnaire Automation Agent automates the intake, classification, and answering of security questionnaires. Using LLM-driven prompts, the agent parses each question, maps it to the relevant security domain category, and delivers structured, policy-compliant answers sourced directly from the knowledge base. This solution standardizes security knowledge, reduces manual effort, and ensures organizations provide audit-ready, compliant responses at scale, empowering security teams to operate efficiently, respond confidently to external demands, and focus on proactive risk management.
ZBrain security questionnaire automation agent is designed to automate the interpretation and delivery of accurate, policy-backed responses to security questionnaires, ensuring consistency and compliance with organizational standards. Below, we outline the detailed steps that illustrate the agent’s workflow, from initial query submission to ongoing improvement:
The workflow begins when users submit a security questionnaire through the agent dashboard or integrated enterprise platforms.
Key Tasks:
Outcome:
Each extracted question is processed individually and classified into one of the core security categories using LLM-driven prompts.
Key Tasks:
Outcome:
Classified questions are matched with curated, policy-backed answers from the structured knowledge base, with the answer extraction process guided by confidence scoring.
Key Tasks:
Outcome:
The agent compiles each answer into an audit-compliant output for user review or export.
Key Tasks:
Outcome:
A feedback mechanism collects user input on answer quality and clarity to drive ongoing agent refinement.
Key Tasks:
Outcome:
Sample of data set required for Security Questionnaire Automation Agent:
Question:
What framework do you follow for evaluating third-party cybersecurity risks?
Question:
How do you align internal stakeholders during vendor selection and onboarding?
Question:
Is your system compatible with enterprise monitoring tools like IBM QRadar or Elastic Security?
Sample output delivered by the Security Questionnaire Automation Agent:
Question:
What framework do you follow for evaluating third-party cybersecurity risks?
Classified Category: Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC)
Confidence Score: Medium
Answer Present: yes
Answer: We follow a risk-based framework aligned with industry standards such as NIST and ISO 27001. Vendors are assessed based on data access levels, compliance certifications, and security incident history.
Justification: The context mentions structured risk assessments and alignment with established cybersecurity standards, which directly support the evaluation of third-party risks.
Question:
How do you align internal stakeholders during vendor selection and onboarding?
Answer: This question could not be answered using the available knowledge base context. Please escalate to an SME for resolution.
Justification: None of the retrieved documents reference stakeholder communication or cross-functional alignment processes during procurement activities.
Question:
Is your system compatible with enterprise monitoring tools like IBM QRadar or Elastic Security?
Classified Category: Integrations
Confidence Score: High
Answer Present: yes
Answer: Yes, our platform supports integration with enterprise-grade monitoring tools, including IBM QRadar and Elastic Security, via API-based log forwarding and SIEM-compatible data structures.
Justification: The context explicitly confirms integration capabilities with enterprise monitoring solutions, detailing supported methods and compatible platforms.
Provides instant, contextual guidance to help debug code, resolve errors, and improve your programming workflow.
Automates security questionnaire answers using LLMs and a structured knowledge base for faster, consistent, and reliable responses.
Generates initial implementation and testing plans for change requests by analyzing request details and referencing past changes.
Automatically collects and consolidates contextual information from logs or monitoring tools to enrich incident or request tickets, accelerating root cause analysis and resolution.
The License Audit and Optimization Agent scans software usage data to identify underused licenses and recommends cost-saving actions like downgrades or removals, optimizing license allocation and reducing costs.
Automates the monitoring of Service Level Agreements (SLAs), ensuring that IT services meet agreed-upon performance metrics and alerting teams when SLAs are breached.