RFQ Response Screening and Analysis Agent

Automates vendor response evaluation by analyzing compliance with RFQ requirements and organizational policies.

About the Agent

ZBrain RFQ/RFP Response Screening and Analysis Agent automates the evaluation of vendor responses against detailed RFQ specifications and internal evaluation criteria. Utilizing a Large Language Model (LLM), it thoroughly assesses key components of RFQ response documents, such as technical specifications, project scope, and pricing terms, etc., and generates detailed reports.

Challenges the ZBrain RFQ/RFP Response Screening and Analysis Agent Addresses

Businesses in today’s competitive market struggle with the manual review of vendor responses to Requests for Quote (RFQs) and Requests for Proposal (RFPs), which is both time-consuming and prone to errors. This often leads to inconsistent evaluations and potential oversights in vendor selection, compounded by the limited scalability of manual reviews that delay decision-making. Additionally, manual evaluations can introduce subjective biases, affecting the fairness and transparency of the selection process.

ZBrain RFQ/RFP Response Screening and Analysis Agent transforms the RFP/ RFQ vendor response evaluations by ensuring consistent, objective, and efficient assessment. It automates the analysis of RFQ/RFP vendor responses, generating detailed reports that summarize each response's alignment with specified RFQ criteria and highlight any gaps. Insights from these reports provide actionable intelligence for informed vendor selection, enhancing strategic decision-making and giving businesses a competitive edge. This automation reduces manual effort, enhances accuracy, and accelerates the decision-making process.

How Does the Agent Work?

ZBrain RFQ/RFP response Screening and analysis agent automates the entire workflow of evaluating RFQ and RFP responses, optimizing the process from RFQ response submission to final decision. The steps outlined below detail the agent's workflow from the initial document input to continuous improvement.

Step 1: RFP Response Document Upload and Classification

In this step, the agent supports RFQ response document uploading and its classification for detailed analysis.

Key Tasks:

  • Document Submission: Users can upload RFP responses via an intuitive interface, instantly triggering the agent to begin processing.
  • Identify the Document Type: Upon document submission, the agent uses an LLM to recognize the type of document enclosed in the response. An RFP response document can consist of these subdocuments or sections: Technical specifications, pricing terms and quotes, compliance certificate, delivery schedule, terms and conditions, supplier qualification details, or any other relevant category.
  • Handling Irrelevant Responses: If an RFP response lacks the necessary details, the agent displays an appropriate message, ensuring users know the submission issue.

Outcome:

  • Document Classification: The agent promptly classifies uploaded RFP responses into relevant categories for further evaluation, ensuring efficient and accurate processing from the outset.

Step 2: Detailed Evaluation of RFP Responses

In this step, the agent extracts relevant RFP requirements and utilizes established rules and criteria from the knowledge base for a comprehensive evaluation.

Key Tasks:

  • Knowledge Base Access: The agent accesses a specifically configured knowledge base containing evaluation criteria and overall RFP requirements.
  • Relevant Rules/ Details Extraction: After determining the document category in the previous step, the agent retrieves the corresponding validation rules and other relevant details from the knowledge base.
  • Response Evaluation: Upon retrieving data from the knowledge base, the agent uses an LLM to compare and evaluate the RFP responses for alignment with the desired requirements and evaluation criteria.

Outcome:

  • Detailed Evaluation Based on Relevant Rules: This step ensures that each RFP response is meticulously evaluated against the relevant specifications and evaluation criteria derived from the knowledge base.

Step 3: RFP Response Evaluation Report Generation

In this step, the agent generates detailed evaluation reports for each RFQ/RFP response.

Key Tasks:

  • Evaluation Report Generation: The agent utilizes an LLM to produce detailed evaluation reports for RFP responses. The report provides an in-depth analysis of how well the response meets particular criteria.
  • Detailed Report Components:
    • a. Document Type and Evaluation Criteria: Each report includes the document specifics, such as a pricing sheet, technical specifications, delivery schedule, terms and conditions, etc., and lists the evaluation criteria used to assess the response.
    • b. Compliance Status: Each criterion is evaluated for compliance, with statuses such as 'Pass,' 'Partial,' or 'Fail' assigned based on how well the response aligns with the RFQ/RFP specifications.
    • c. Gap Analysis: Any gaps in the response are identified, and areas where the information provided does not meet the required standards or expectations are noted. It provides a critical overview of areas needing improvement or clarification.
    • d. Evaluation Summary: A concise summary captures the vendor response document’s alignment with RFQ/RFP requirements, detailing its strengths and weaknesses observed during the evaluation.

Outcome:

  • Detailed Evaluation Report: This report offers a structured and in-depth review of each vendor's submission, highlighting compliance with technical, operational, and service requirements. It provides actionable insights for informed decision-making in vendor selection, ensuring selections are based on detailed and objective criteria.

Step 4: Continuous Improvement Through Human Feedback

After the RFP response evaluation process, the agent incorporates user feedback to enhance the accuracy and effectiveness of the evaluation process.

Key Tasks:

  • Feedback Collection: Users can provide feedback on the accuracy, relevance, and comprehensiveness of the RFP response evaluation reports.
  • Feedback Analysis and Learning: The agent analyzes the collected feedback to identify common issues and pinpoint areas needing improvement within the evaluation process. This ongoing learning process is essential for maintaining high standards of accuracy and effectiveness, enhancing the agent’s overall performance and reliability.

Outcome:

  • Adaptive Enhancement: The agent continuously refines its evaluation capabilities, ensuring it remains aligned with evolving project specifications, user expectations, and industry standards. This ongoing learning process is crucial for maintaining high standards of accuracy and effectiveness, thereby enhancing the agent’s overall performance and reliability in evaluations.

Why Use RFQ Response Screening and Analysis Agent?

  • Enhanced Accuracy: Automates the evaluation of RFP responses, ensuring precise adherence to RFQ specifications and organizational policies.
  • Operational Efficiency: Significantly reduces the effort spent on manual reviews, speeding up the procurement cycle and organizational processes.
  • Faster Vendor Selection: Accelerates the overall vendor selection timeline, enabling quicker project initiation and competitive advantage.
  • Enhanced Scalability: Effectively handles increasing volumes of responses, maintaining quality and consistency as organizational needs grow.
  • Enhanced Vendor Relationships: Ensuring consistent and fair evaluation helps build trust and transparency with potential and existing vendors.
  • Improved Decision Making: Delivers detailed evaluation reports that enhance decision-making capabilities, ensuring well-informed and data-backed choices.

Download the solution document

Accuracy
TBD

Speed
TBD

Input Data Set

Sample of data set required for RFQ Response Screening and Analysis Agent:

PRICING PROPOSAL

ATLAS MANUFACTURING ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS UPGRADE

RFQ Number: EE-2025-0042


1. EXECUTIVE PRICING SUMMARY

ElectraTech Solutions is pleased to provide the following comprehensive pricing for the Atlas Manufacturing Electrical Systems Upgrade project:

Category Price
Equipment and Materials $2,875,250
Installation Labor $1,435,500
Engineering and Project Management $375,000
Testing and Commissioning $125,000
Training and Documentation $55,000
Total Project Investment $4,865,750

This fixed-price proposal includes all equipment, materials, labor, engineering, management, and services required to complete the project as specified in the RFQ and our technical proposal. All prices are in US Dollars and remain valid for 90 days from the proposal submission date.

2. DETAILED PRICING BREAKDOWN

2.1 Equipment and Materials

2.1.1 Power Distribution Equipment

Item Description Quantity Unit Price Extended Price
1.1 Siemens SIVACON S8 4000A Main Switchgear 1 $485,750 $485,750
1.2 GE Spectra Series 800A Distribution Panels 12 $28,500 $342,000
1.3 Schneider Electric 75kVA Transformers 4 $18,750 $75,000
1.4 Schneider Electric 150kVA Transformers 4 $32,500 $130,000
1.5 Eaton 9395P 200kVA UPS System 1 $235,000 $235,000
1.6 Distribution Feeders and Branch Circuit Materials 1 lot $175,000 $175,000
Subtotal - Power Distribution Equipment $1,442,750

2.1.2 Control Systems

Item Description Quantity Unit Price Extended Price
2.1 Allen-Bradley ControlLogix 5580 PLCs 15 $18,500 $277,500
2.2 Allen-Bradley CENTERLINE 2100 MCCs 4 $125,000 $500,000
2.3 Control System Network Components 1 lot $85,000 $85,000
2.4 Control Panels and Interface Equipment 1 lot $65,000 $65,000
Subtotal - Control Systems $927,500

2.1.3 Lighting Systems

Item Description Quantity Unit Price Extended Price
3.1 Philips Gardco LED High Bay Fixtures 450 $625 $281,250
3.2 Lighting Control System 1 lot $87,500 $87,500
3.3 Emergency Lighting Equipment 1 lot $45,000 $45,000
3.4 Lighting Installation Materials 1 lot $28,500 $28,500
Subtotal - Lighting Systems $442,250

2.1.4 Energy Management and Safety Systems

Item Description Quantity Unit Price Extended Price
4.1 Schneider Electric EcoStruxure Power Monitoring 1 $125,000 $125,000
4.2 Arc Flash Protection Equipment 1 lot $85,000 $85,000
4.3 Emergency Power Off System 1 lot $55,000 $55,000
4.4 Personal Protective Equipment 1 lot $12,750 $12,750
Subtotal - Energy Management and Safety Systems $277,750

TOTAL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS: $2,875,250

2.2 Installation Labor

2.2.1 Installation Labor by Phase

Phase Description Hours Rate Extended Price
1 Engineering & Design 1,200 $125 $150,000
2 Primary Infrastructure 3,600 $115 $414,000
3 Secondary Systems 4,800 $115 $552,000
4 Control Systems 2,250 $125 $281,250
5 Testing & Commissioning 350 $125 $43,750
Subtotal - Labor by Phase $1,441,000

2.2.2 Labor Rates by Classification

Classification Standard Rate Overtime Rate Weekend Rate
Project Manager $150/hour $225/hour $300/hour
Lead Engineer $145/hour $217.50/hour $290/hour
Senior Electrician $125/hour $187.50/hour $250/hour
Journeyman Electrician $115/hour $172.50/hour $230/hour
Controls Specialist $135/hour $202.50/hour $270/hour
Apprentice/Helper $75/hour $112.50/hour $150/hour

Note: Labor estimates include standard, overtime, and weekend rates as appropriate for the implementation schedule.

TOTAL INSTALLATION LABOR: $1,435,500

2.3 Engineering and Project Management

Item Description Quantity Unit Price Extended Price
1 Project Management 1,200 hours $150 $180,000
2 Engineering Services 950 hours $145 $137,750
3 BIM/CAD Services 450 hours $95 $42,750
4 Administrative Support 240 hours $60 $14,500
Subtotal - Engineering and Project Management $375,000

2.4 Testing and Commissioning

Item Description Quantity Unit Price Extended Price
1 Pre-Installation Testing 1 lot $35,000 $35,000
2 In-Process Testing 1 lot $25,000 $25,000
3 Final System Commissioning 1 lot $45,000 $45,000
4 Arc Flash Study and Labeling 1 lot $20,000 $20,000
Subtotal - Testing and Commissioning $125,000

2.5 Training and Documentation

Item Description Quantity Unit Price Extended Price
1 Operation and Maintenance Training 80 hours $250 $20,000
2 System Documentation 1 lot $25,000 $25,000
3 As-Built Drawings 1 lot $10,000 $10,000
Subtotal - Training and Documentation $55,000

3. OPTIONAL SERVICES AND EQUIPMENT

ElectraTech Solutions offers the following optional services and equipment enhancements:

Item Description Price
1 Extended Warranty (Additional 2 years beyond included 5-year warranty) $225,000
2 Premium Maintenance Package (3-year term) $175,000
3 Energy Performance Guarantee (5-year term) $125,000
4 Advanced Analytics Package $85,000
5 Remote Monitoring Service (Annual) $45,000
6 Additional Training (40 hours) $12,500
7 Spare Parts Package $65,000

4. PAYMENT SCHEDULE

ElectraTech Solutions proposes the following payment schedule:

Milestone Percentage Amount Expected Date
Contract Award 15% $729,862.50 June 15, 2025
Design Completion 10% $486,575.00 August 10, 2025
Major Equipment Delivery 30% $1,459,725.00 September 7, 2025
Primary Infrastructure Completion 15% $729,862.50 September 25, 2025
Secondary System Completion 15% $729,862.50 November 15, 2025
Substantial Completion 10% $486,575.00 December 12, 2025
Final Acceptance 5% $243,287.50 December 30, 2025
Total 100% $4,865,750.00

5. TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP ANALYSIS

ElectraTech Solutions has prepared a 10-year Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) analysis to demonstrate the long-term value of our solution:

Category Current System Proposed Solution Savings
Initial Investment N/A $4,865,750 -$4,865,750
Energy Costs (10 years) $16,200,000 $12,318,750 $3,881,250
Maintenance Costs (10 years) $2,850,000 $1,625,000 $1,225,000
Downtime Costs (10 years) $7,500,000 $1,875,000 $5,625,000
Replacement Parts (10 years) $1,450,000 $725,000 $725,000
End-of-Life Value $125,000 $550,000 $425,000
Net 10-Year TCO $27,875,000 $20,859,500 $7,015,500

Notes on TCO Analysis:

  • Energy costs based on current $0.135/kWh blended rate with projected 3% annual increases
  • Maintenance costs include service contracts, repairs, and internal labor
  • Downtime costs calculated using Atlas's provided production value of $15,000 per hour
  • End-of-life value represents estimated salvage/resale value after 10 years

6. PRICING NOTES AND ASSUMPTIONS

  1. Validity: This pricing proposal is valid for 90 days from the submission date.

  2. Taxes: Prices do not include applicable sales or use taxes. Atlas Manufacturing will be responsible for any taxes, fees, or duties that may apply.

  3. Permits: Costs for standard electrical permits are included. Special permits, if required, will be processed at cost plus 10%.

  4. Working Hours: Base pricing assumes work performed during standard business hours (7:00 AM – 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday) except where weekend work is specifically noted for transitions. Premium time is included for scheduled weekend transitions.

  5. Site Access: Pricing assumes reasonable access to all work areas during scheduled work periods.

  6. Hazardous Materials: Proposal does not include removal or abatement of hazardous materials (e.g., asbestos, lead paint). If encountered, such work will be addressed through the change order process.

  7. Existing Conditions: Pricing assumes existing electrical infrastructure is in the condition represented during the site visit. Significant undisclosed deficiencies may require additional work through the change order process.

  8. Salvage: Unless otherwise specified, all removed electrical equipment becomes the property of ElectraTech Solutions. Salvage value has been factored into pricing.

  9. Changes: Any changes to scope, schedule, or requirements will be addressed through a formal change order process with associated cost and schedule impacts.

  10. Payment Terms: Net 30 days from invoice date. Late payments subject to 1.5% monthly finance charge.

7. VALUE-ADDED OFFERINGS

ElectraTech Solutions is providing the following value-added offerings at no additional cost to Atlas Manufacturing:

  1. Extended Warranty: Standard 3-year warranty extended to 5 years on all equipment and labor at no additional cost ($175,000 value)

  2. Quarterly Health Checks: Quarterly preventive maintenance inspections during the warranty period ($45,000 value)

  3. Energy Baseline Study: Comprehensive energy usage analysis prior to implementation to establish accurate baselines ($15,000 value)

  4. Enhanced Training: Standard 40 hours of training extended to 80 hours customized for Atlas personnel ($20,000 value)

  5. 24/7 Priority Support: Dedicated support line with 4-hour response guarantee for critical issues during warranty period ($35,000 value)

Total Added Value: $290,000

8. CONCLUSION

ElectraTech Solutions' pricing proposal represents an exceptional value for Atlas Manufacturing, balancing initial investment with long-term operational benefits. Our solution delivers:

  • Guaranteed energy savings of at least 22%
  • Extended 5-year warranty for peace of mind
  • Positive ROI within 3.8 years
  • $7 million 10-year TCO advantage
  • Minimal production disruption during implementation

We are confident that this represents the best overall value for Atlas Manufacturing's critical electrical infrastructure upgrade and look forward to the opportunity to deliver this important project.


For questions regarding this pricing proposal, please contact:

Sarah Chen, P.E., PMP
Senior Project Manager
ElectraTech Solutions, Inc.
(216) 555-3240
schen@electratechsolutions.com

Deliverable Example

Sample output delivered by the RFQ Response Screening and Analysis Agent:

Document Type: Pricing Sheet

Evaluation Criteria:

  1. Pricing Structure:
    • Equipment Costs
    • Installation Costs
    • Engineering and Project Management
    • Ongoing Costs
    • Payment Terms
    • Total Cost of Ownership

Comparison Summary:

  1. Equipment Costs:

    • Findings: The pricing sheet provides a detailed breakdown of equipment including manufacturer, model numbers, specifications, unit prices, and extended prices for each item. Volume discounts are not mentioned.
    • Compliance Status: Pass
  2. Installation Costs:

    • Findings: Detailed installation labor by phase and labor rates by classification are provided, including overtime and weekend rates. Subcontractor costs are not specifically outlined but may be embedded within phases.
    • Compliance Status: Partial
  3. Engineering and Project Management:

    • Findings: Engineering and project management costs are detailed including project management, engineering services, BIM/CAD services, and administrative support.
    • Compliance Status: Pass
  4. Ongoing Costs:

    • Findings: Optional services such as extended warranty, premium maintenance package, and remote monitoring service are outlined, but software licensing and help desk support are not explicitly detailed. Warranty costs cover extended options.
    • Compliance Status: Partial
  5. Payment Terms:

    • Findings: Payment schedule tied to project milestones is presented. Early payment discounts are not mentioned; retention terms of 10% are standard and not explicitly addressed.
    • Compliance Status: Partial
  6. Total Cost of Ownership:

    • Findings: The pricing sheet does not provide a 10-year cost analysis including energy consumption estimates and other ongoing costs like replacement parts and licensing fees.
    • Compliance Status: Fail

Gap Analysis:

  • Equipment Costs: No volume discounts are mentioned which could affect pricing attractiveness.
  • Installation Costs: Subcontractor costs are not explicitly segmented, potentially overlooking specific compliance needs.
  • Ongoing Costs: Lack of explicitly detailed software licensing and help desk support options impairs full compliance.
  • Payment Terms: Absence of early payment discount options and detailed retention terms leave room for improved payment scheduling strategies.
  • Total Cost of Ownership: Failure to include comprehensive 10-year cost analysis limits the proposal’s insight into future financial implications.

Evaluation Summary:

ElectraTech Solutions has provided a comprehensive and detailed pricing proposal for equipment, installation, and project management costs. The document meets some requirements for compliance with RFQ expectations, primarily in the detailed breakdown of initial costs. However, it inadequately covers some aspects of ongoing costs and total cost of ownership, which adversely affects its overall compliance status in terms of long-term financial planning. Further information or amendments could enhance the competitiveness of this proposal regarding strategic financial insights for Atlas Manufacturing.

Related Agents