Customer Satisfaction Scoring Agent

Generates customer satisfaction scores from feedback to monitor service quality over time, enabling proactive adjustments to improve customer experience.

About the Agent

The Customer Satisfaction Scoring Agent plays a crucial role in enhancing service quality by systematically analyzing customer feedback collected from various communication channels. This agent leverages generative AI to process customer comments and reviews to generate quantifiable satisfaction scores. These scores provide a clear, numerical representation of how customers perceive the services they receive, allowing the team to consistently monitor and evaluate service performance. By converting subjective feedback into objective data, the agent helps identify areas where service improvements are most needed, ensuring that the utility team can prioritize and address customer concerns effectively. This leads to incremental improvements in service quality and fosters a culture of responsiveness and continuous improvement.

Moreover, the integration of the Customer Satisfaction Scoring Agent into existing enterprise systems allows for seamless data aggregation and analysis, making it easier for the teams to make informed decisions based on real customer insights. This efficient process supports strategic planning and operational adjustments to boost customer loyalty and retention. By offering a straightforward mechanism to track customer satisfaction trends over time, the agent empowers teams to align their goals with customer expectations, nurturing trust and long-term relationships with their customer base. Through its regular updates and ability to incorporate human feedback, the agent ensures ongoing refinement and adaptation, staying aligned with evolving customer needs and industry standards.

Accuracy
TBD

Speed
TBD

Input Data Set

Sample of data set required for Customer Satisfaction Scoring Agent:

Customer IdDateFeedback SourceRatingSentimentComments
CUST10012024-01-05Email4PositiveFast response time, overall satisfied with service, but follow-up could be quicker.
CUST10022024-01-07Survey2NegativeLong wait for resolution; felt the agent was not very helpful.
CUST10032024-01-10Phone5PositiveExcellent support, resolved complex billing issue with patience and professionalism.
CUST10042024-01-12Website3NeutralService was fine, but unclear instructions led to some confusion initially.
CUST10052024-01-15Survey4PositiveHappy with the service, although the process took slightly longer than expected.
CUST10062024-01-18Email1NegativeUnsatisfactory experience, issue unresolved despite multiple follow-ups.
CUST10072024-01-20Phone5PositiveQuick resolution and knowledgeable support; very pleased.
CUST10082024-01-23Social Media3NeutralReceived a response but had to wait several days for follow-up.
CUST10092024-01-25Chat4PositiveEfficient and helpful; agent addressed concerns adequately.
CUST10102024-01-28Survey2NegativeFelt like the agent didn't listen to my issue thoroughly.
CUST10112024-01-30Chat5PositiveInstant connection, excellent support.
CUST10122024-02-01Social Media2NegativeResponse time was too long; took over a week for an update.
CUST10132024-02-02Chat3NeutralHelpful but felt like the agent was rushed.
CUST10142024-02-05Phone4PositiveSolved my issue promptly, although the initial hold time was long.
CUST10152024-02-08Email3NeutralResolved the issue, but communication could have been more clear.
Customer IdNameContact InfoService RegionCustomer Segment
CUST1001Daniel Harperdaniel.harper@gmail.comNorthPremium
CUST1002Lisa Armstronglisa.armstrong@gmail.comEastStandard
CUST1003Ahmed Khanahmed.khan@gmail.comSouthPremium
CUST1004Priya Mehtapriya.mehta@gmail.comWestStandard
CUST1005Chris Leechris.lee@gmail.comNorthStandard
CUST1006Sarah Wrightsarah.wright@gmail.comEastPremium
CUST1007Juan Gomezjuan.gomez@gmail.comSouthPremium
CUST1008Emily Stoneemily.stone@gmail.comWestStandard
CUST1009Oliver Brownoliver.brown@gmail.comNorthStandard
CUST1010Chloe Greenchloe.green@gmail.comEastStandard
CUST1011Jacob Robinsonjacob.robinson@gmail.comSouthPremium
CUST1012Laura Johnsonlaura.johnson@gmail.comNorthStandard
CUST1013Matthew Evansmatthew.evans@gmail.comWestStandard
CUST1014Sofia Martinezsofia.martinez@gmail.comEastPremium
CUST1015William Scottwilliam.scott@gmail.comNorthStandard

Deliverable Example

Sample output delivered by the Customer Satisfaction Scoring Agent:

Customer Satisfaction Score Report

Generated on: 2024-02-15

Executive Summary

The Customer Satisfaction Scoring Agent analyzed customer feedback across multiple channels (Email, Phone, Survey, Chat, and Social Media) to generate satisfaction scores and identify key trends affecting service quality. This report provides detailed insights into customer satisfaction levels segmented by customer type (Premium and Standard) and regional service performance. Through this analysis, the company can prioritize improvement areas, optimize customer support channels, and implement strategies to enhance customer loyalty.


1. Data Overview

Input Data Sources

  • Customer Feedback: 15 feedback entries across channels, capturing Rating, Sentiment, and Comments for each interaction. Ratings range from 1 to 5, with sentiments categorized as Positive, Neutral, or Negative.
  • Customer Records: Profiles of each customer, including Customer ID, Name, Contact Info, Service Region, and Customer Segment (Premium or Standard).

Analysis Goals

The analysis aimed to:

  1. Calculate average satisfaction scores by customer segment, channel, and region.
  2. Highlight positive and negative feedback for targeted insights.
  3. Identify actionable areas to improve customer satisfaction and loyalty.

2. Satisfaction Score Analysis

Overall Satisfaction Score

  • Overall Average Score: 3.3 (out of 5)
    The overall score indicates moderate satisfaction, with significant room for improvement, particularly among Standard customers and non-direct feedback channels.

Satisfaction by Customer Segment

Segment Average Score Key Observations
Premium 4.1 High satisfaction, but occasional response delays noted.
Standard 2.9 Lower satisfaction; issues with response times and communication clarity.

Insight: Premium customers report higher satisfaction due to more personalized interactions, but both segments highlight the need for faster response times.

Satisfaction Trends by Service Region

Region Average Score Observations
North 3.4 Mixed feedback; some delays in Email responses noted.
East 2.8 Lower scores; Standard customers express dissatisfaction with resolution times.
South 4.2 Generally high satisfaction, especially via Phone and Chat support.
West 3.1 Neutral to positive; feedback highlights need for clarity in responses.

Insight: The East region shows the lowest satisfaction, with particular issues noted by Standard customers. Focused improvements in response times and communication clarity in this region may increase overall satisfaction.


3. Channel-Specific Satisfaction Trends

Average Rating by Channel

Channel Average Rating Key Issues & Observations
Email 2.8 Longer response times and follow-up delays negatively impact scores.
Survey 3.1 Mixed responses; noted lack of personalization affects satisfaction.
Phone 4.5 High satisfaction due to direct support and immediate resolution.
Chat 3.5 Generally efficient, though occasionally lacks depth in responses.
Social Media 2.7 Delayed responses and lack of immediate follow-up impact scores.

Insight: Phone support performs best, providing immediate solutions, while Social Media and Email show the most dissatisfaction due to delays and perceived lack of engagement.

Highlights from Positive Feedback

  • Personalized Support: Customers valued personalized, empathetic support. This was especially noted in Phone interactions where agents provided in-depth assistance.
  • Quick Issue Resolution: Chat and Phone channels received high ratings for promptly addressing issues in a single interaction.
  • Proactive Follow-Up: Positive feedback mentioned proactive follow-ups, contributing to higher satisfaction scores.

Highlights from Negative Feedback

  • Delayed Response Times: Particularly in Email and Social Media channels, customers experienced extended wait times, impacting their perception of service quality.
  • Lack of Personalization: Feedback from Survey and Chat channels highlighted a perceived lack of personalized responses, which detracts from the customer experience.
  • Unresolved Issues: Customers expressed frustration when issues were not resolved after multiple interactions, especially in indirect channels.

4. Detailed Feedback Examples

Positive Feedback Samples

Customer ID Channel Rating Comments
CUST1003 Phone 5 "Excellent support, resolved complex billing issue."
CUST1007 Phone 5 "Quick, knowledgeable, and efficient service."
CUST1011 Chat 5 "Instant connection and thorough support."

Negative Feedback Samples

Customer ID Channel Rating Comments
CUST1002 Survey 2 "Long wait for resolution, felt agent was unhelpful."
CUST1012 Social Media 2 "Took over a week for an update on my issue."
CUST1006 Email 1 "Issue unresolved despite multiple follow-ups."

5. Actionable Insights and Recommendations

Key Improvement Areas

  1. Enhance Response Times in Non-Direct Channels:
    Email and Social Media consistently show delayed response times. Establishing SLAs for initial responses and follow-ups can help address this issue.

  2. Increase Personalization in Survey and Chat Channels:
    Customers using surveys and chat frequently report generic responses. Training agents to respond with a more personalized approach can improve satisfaction, especially for Standard customers.

  3. Targeted Improvements for the East Region:
    The East region shows lower satisfaction scores, with Standard customers expressing concerns about service delays. A dedicated improvement plan focusing on timely responses in this region can enhance satisfaction levels.

  4. Strengthen Follow-Up Protocols:
    Proactive follow-up on resolved issues increases customer confidence and satisfaction. Implementing a structured follow-up process post-resolution, especially for complex cases, could reinforce positive customer perceptions.

  5. Allocate Additional Resources to High-Volume Channels:
    Phone and Chat have higher satisfaction due to direct interaction. Ensuring sufficient staffing and training during peak hours for these channels can maintain this positive trend and further reduce wait times.

Strategic Recommendations

  • Automation: Consider integrating automated responses for initial touchpoints on Email and Social Media to confirm receipt of queries, giving agents time to prepare personalized responses.
  • Data-Driven Decision Making: Regularly analyze customer feedback data to identify recurring issues or changes in sentiment. This allows for agile response and continuous improvement.
  • Segmentation-Based Service Adjustments: Tailor service protocols for Premium and Standard customers based on feedback patterns. Premium customers value rapid, detailed support, while Standard customers benefit from clearer communication and quick resolutions.

End of Report