What is vibe coding? AI-powered software development explained

Vibe coding is transforming how software is written. Coined by AI expert Andrej Karpathy, the term refers to a programming style where developers rely heavily on AI models to generate, refine, and debug code. Instead of meticulously crafting every line, programmers issue high-level commands and let AI handle the details. This transformation ushers in a new era of coding, where AI acts as a co-developer, making programming faster, more accessible, and intuitive.

This article explores in detail vibe coding, tools, advantages, real-world applications, and its impact on software development.

What is vibe coding?

Vibe coding is a term popularized by AI expert Andrej Karpathy to describe a new style of programming where developers let AI do the heavy lifting of writing code while they guide it with high-level instructions. Rather than painstakingly writing and debugging every line of code, the programmer “fully give[s] in to the vibes” of an AI assistant and almost “forgets that the code even exists.”​ In practice, this means describing what you want in plain English (or even voice), accepting the AI’s code suggestions, and iteratively refining the program through conversation. Karpathy quipped that when vibe coding, “I just see stuff, say stuff, run stuff, and copy-paste stuff, and it mostly works.”

Vibe coding: A paradigm shift from traditional coding

In traditional coding, developers themselves write the logic, structure, and syntax of programs, carefully reviewing code and manually debugging errors. Vibe coding flips this script. The “programming language” is essentially a natural language (e.g., English)​, and the developer’s role becomes more of a guide or collaborator with the AI. Instead of focusing on the minutiae of syntax and implementation details, the developer focuses on conveying the desired intent or “vibe” of the program to the AI. For example, rather than hunting through code to change a UI style or fix a bug, a vibe coder might simply tell the AI, “decrease the padding on the sidebar by half,” and let the AI find and edit the relevant code​. Karpathy notes that he often doesn’t even read code diffs or error messages in depth – he’ll just accept the AI’s changes and paste any error output back into the prompt for the AI to fix​. This stands in sharp contrast to conventional methods that emphasize careful code review, manual debugging, and full understanding of the codebase.

AI tools enabling vibe coding

Vibe coding has been made possible by advanced AI coding assistants that can generate and refine code from natural language prompts. One of the tools at the center of this movement is Cursor’s Composer, an AI-powered code editor. Composer can “explore code, write new features, and modify existing code” based on user instructions​. When paired with a powerful language model (like Anthropic’s Sonnet model), these tools let developers create applications from scratch with minimal manual coding. Essentially, “the AI just needs the user to guide it” while it handles the actual code generation​.

It’s not just Cursor and Sonnet driving this trend. Other AI coding assistants have similar capabilities. For instance, Replit (an online IDE) has been developing Replit AI/Agent, which allows users to build apps by describing what they need in prompts. According to Replit’s CEO Amjad Masad, “75% of Replit customers never write a single line of code” when creating projects, indicating that many are already relying on AI or template-driven tools​. Early products like GitHub Copilot introduced the idea of AI autocompleting code, but vibe coding tools go further by taking high-level instructions and managing multi-step code generation and refactoring. In short, these AI tools serve as creative partners: the developer defines the vision or feature, and the AI generates, adjusts, and fixes the code to make it happen.

How vibe coding works

Unlike traditional coding, which demands detailed knowledge of syntax and debugging, vibe coding follows a different approach:

1. Describe the goal: In a vibe coding workflow, the developer might start with an empty project in an AI-enabled IDE like Cursor. They then describe what they want in steps or ask the AI questions about the code in plain English. Example: “Create a React app with a login form and a dark mode toggle.”

2. AI generates the code: The AI model or tool provides the initial code structure and implementation.

3. Refinement via conversation: The developer iterates by prompting the AI to adjust the code. Example: “Make the form fields rounded and add a transition effect.”

4. Automated debugging: The AI can run code or tests in some setups – iterating, linting, and running tests autonomously to verify the output​. In Karpathy’s usage, if the program throws an error, he feeds the error message back to the AI (with no additional comment), and the AI debugs itself​.

5. Accept and deploy: Once satisfied, the developer integrates the final version.

Multimodal interaction: Vibe coding tools like Cursor Composer also support voice input, making the experience even more hands-off. Karpathy has used SuperWhisper (an AI speech-to-text tool) to talk to the Composer and issue commands by voice​. He says that he “barely even touch[es] the keyboard” when vibe coding​. This natural interface means coding starts to feel like having a conversation about the software rather than typing out code. The AI handles code edits and additions under the hood. Karpathy’s approach is to accept all AI-suggested changes by default (clicking “Accept All” in the tool) and only intervene by describing new changes or pointing out issues​. The result is that the codebase can grow rapidly with minimal manual edits. As he describes, the code can even grow beyond his “usual comprehension” until he takes time to read through it carefully​ – highlighting how the AI is doing most of the detailed work.

Advantages of vibe coding

Vibe coding offers several potential benefits over traditional coding practices:

• Speed and productivity: Developers can build functioning software much faster by offloading laborious coding tasks to AI. Complex boilerplate or repetitive code can be generated in seconds. In practical terms, this can lead to exponential productivity gains measured in orders of magnitude​. One venture capitalist noted that using AI in this way lets you get “the first 75% [of a feature] trivially, and it’s amazing”​. This acceleration means prototypes that might have taken days or weeks to code by hand can be built in hours. For example, a hobbyist reported creating a restaurant menu translator app in a single evening by continuously prompting an AI for each feature, something that would have been much slower with manual coding​.

• Lower barrier to entry: Because the coding is done in natural language, people with little to no programming experience can create software. AI researcher Harry Law observes that “for a total beginner… it can be incredibly satisfying to build something that works in the space of an hour” using these tools​. This democratizes development – entrepreneurs, designers, or domain experts who aren’t fluent in programming can still turn their ideas into working apps by describing their needs. Entire applications can be built with zero handwritten code, as evidenced by Replit’s finding that a majority of their users’ projects involve no direct coding by the user at all​.

• Focus on creativity and design: Vibe coding allows developers to spend more time on high-level creativity and product design rather than wrestling with syntax errors or plumbing. The mundane aspects of coding (e.g., fixing missing semicolons, dealing with type mismatches, writing boilerplate CRUD functions) are handled by the AI. As one commentator put it, developers can “no longer waste hours on painful type errors or missing semicolons” and instead concentrate on “the creative essence of software development: imagining and exploring what to build next.”​

• This shift can make software development feel more like brainstorming or sketching – you try ideas by asking the AI to implement them, see the results, and iteratively refine them. The overall experience is more playful and exploratory (“flow”-based), which can spur innovation.

• Rapid prototyping and iteration: Vibe coding shines for quickly prototyping ideas and getting them to a demo stage. Karpathy noted that the approach is great for “throwaway weekend projects” or building a web app as a one-off experiment​. If you have an idea, you might be “only a few prompts away from a product,” says Misbah Syed, a startup founder who uses vibe coding to develop his company’s apps​. For instance, Syed’s team built Brainy Docs, a tool that converts a PDF document into an explainer video with slides, using AI coding assistants – he simply describes the features, and when errors arise, feeds them back to the AI for fixes​. This means a single individual or small team can go from concept to working prototype extremely quickly, which is invaluable in hackathons, startups, and other fast-paced environments. It enables more experimentation since trying a bold idea is as easy as telling the AI what you want and seeing if it works.

• Accessibility and convenience: The ability to code by voice or simple language commands makes software development more accessible to those who find traditional coding intimidating. It can also make multitasking easier – one could literally code while doing other activities. This convenience can turn coding into a more natural part of other workflows. Non-engineers can integrate coding tasks into their job without steep learning, e.g., a marketer could whip up a custom data visualization by asking an AI, or a teacher could create a simple educational game via prompts. In essence, vibe coding opens the door for more people to create software on their own, blurring the line between users and developers.

Optimize Your Operations With AI Agents

Our AI agents streamline your workflows, unlocking new levels of business efficiency!

Explore Our AI Agents

Limitations of the vibe coding approach

Despite its promise, vibe coding comes with notable limitations and challenges:

• Lack of learning and insight: For beginners, using AI to handle all coding can become a crutch. While they may get quick results, they might skip learning fundamental concepts of computer science. “Beginners can make fast progress, but it might prevent them from learning about system architecture or performance,” warns Harry Law of Cambridge​. In a traditional setting, struggling through coding tasks teaches important lessons about how and why code works. Vibe coding bypasses much of that struggle. This means a novice who only vibe codes might build a working app without really understanding it. There’s a concern that an overreliance on AI could produce a generation of developers who can prompt models but lack deeper coding skills to troubleshoot or optimize code when the AI falls short.

• Code quality and maintainability: AI-generated code might not adhere to best practices or optimal design, especially if the user isn’t guiding it carefully. Karpathy admitted that his AI-written code “grows beyond my usual comprehension,” and he would have to read through it for a while to fully grasp it​. This hints at a maintainability issue: if code becomes too large or convoluted (because the AI kept appending fixes and features without refactoring properly), it can be hard for humans to manage later. Overreliance on AI can also accumulate technical debt – messy, inefficient code or quick fixes that work initially but create problems when scaling or modifying the software​. Without diligent code review, “security vulnerabilities may also slip through,” Law notes​. Blindly accepting AI suggestions means bugs or poor implementations might go unnoticed. In critical applications, this could be risky. Essentially, vibe coding can produce code that works in the happy path but might hide landmines in edge cases, performance, or security that a seasoned engineer would normally catch.

• Difficulty with complex or evolving requirements: While AI coders excel at producing a lot of code quickly for a well-specified request, they can struggle with larger projects or iterative development. A senior Microsoft engineer noted that large language models are “great for one-off tasks but not good at maintaining or extending projects.” As software grows, it requires understanding context, managing state, and making architectural changes – areas where current AI may get “lost in the requirements” and start to generate irrelevant or incorrect code​. Andrej Karpathy experienced this when the AI sometimes “can’t fix a bug” or hits a stumbling block; his workaround was to try “random changes until it goes away,” which is hardly a systematic solution. Venture capitalist Andrew Chen found that using AI to add features and keep editing code is “both brilliant, and enormously frustrating” — “You can get the first 75% trivially… Then try to make changes and iterate, and it’s like you…” (the process falls apart)​. This suggests that refinement beyond a prototype can be arduous. Getting that last 25% of polish or handling complex integrations often requires the deep understanding that AI lacks. In many cases, human developers must step back in to reorganize code or implement tricky logic that the AI can’t handle gracefully.

• Debugging and accuracy challenges: AI models are not infallible – they make mistakes in code logic and can misinterpret instructions. When an error is encountered, the vibe coding approach is to feed it back to the AI, but this doesn’t always yield a fix. If the bug is subtle or requires understanding the broader context, the AI might flounder, cycling through attempts. One Reddit user remarked that for complex issues, the feedback loop of checking code and forming a hypothesis is often “faster without an intermediary LLM in the process” because the AI might suggest irrelevant fixes​. Furthermore, crafting precise prompts to debug a problem can be as tricky as debugging manually – “to ask the right question, you already need to know most of the answer,” as one programmer noted​. In short, troubleshooting via an AI agent can become an exercise in trial and error. If the AI’s suggestions fail repeatedly, a developer may have to dive into the code themselves, potentially negating the time saved. There’s also the issue of AI hallucinations – the model might generate code that looks plausible but is logically wrong or uses non-existent functions. Such errors can be time-consuming to untangle if one is not reading the code carefully.

Critiques and concerns about AI-generated code

The rise of vibe coding has sparked debates in the software community about the implications of relying heavily on AI for code generation:

• Overhype and reliability: Some experts believe vibe coding, as exciting as it is, might be overhyped in its current form. The anonymous Microsoft engineer described the concept as “a little overhyped,” noting that while useful, today’s LLMs “generate a lot of nonsense content” when pushed beyond simple tasks​. Andrew Chen similarly cautioned that the experience can become “enormously frustrating” when you move past basic features​. These critiques highlight that AI coding tools still have limitations and can’t magically handle all programming needs. At some point, human intervention and thought are needed to ensure the software is correct and maintainable. The hype around AI coding might give non-engineers unrealistic expectations about firing off a prompt and getting a perfect, production-ready application. There’s a growing call for balancing optimism with a clear understanding of what current AI can and cannot do.

• Skill atrophy and developer growth: A major concern is that over-reliance on AI could erode the skills of developers – or discourage new developers from learning deeply. If one can build apps by just describing them, will upcoming programmers still learn algorithms, data structures, debugging, and system design? Seasoned engineers worry that constantly using AI as a crutch means less practice in critical thinking and problem-solving. “Ease of use is a double-edged sword,” as Law put it​. This has led some in the industry to ask whether vibe coding is “the death knell of skilled programming” – if the craft of coding by hand might diminish over time. Experienced programmers may find themselves needing to mentor AI-generated code rather than writing it, which is a different skill set. There’s also concern about trusting the AI blindly: junior developers might accept AI output without question, missing the chance to analyze and understand the code’s behavior. In the long run, this could widen the gap between “idea people” and the engineers who actually understand the machinery under the hood.

• Quality, security, and accountability: Relying on AI to generate code raises questions of accountability. If an AI writes flawed or insecure code that causes a failure, who is responsible – the tool or the user who accepted it? This is a grey area that companies will have to consider. As noted earlier, without proper code reviews, vulnerabilities can slip in​. Security experts are cautious about code that nobody fully reviewed or understood being deployed. Additionally, AI models tend to incorporate common patterns from training data, which might include outdated or suboptimal practices. This could lead to less efficient software if developers don’t intervene. Code ownership is another concern: if large swaths of code are AI-written, a team might find it hard to maintain that codebase, especially if the original person who prompted it leaves. The code might lack clear structure or comments since it was never manually curated. All these factors suggest that human oversight remains crucial even in vibe coding – the AI is a valuable tool but not a replacement for due diligence.

• Impact on software engineering roles: The advent of AI-assisted development is prompting a reevaluation of the software engineer’s role in the industry. Tech leaders like Sam Altman and Mark Zuckerberg foresee big changes: Altman predicted that software engineering would be “very different by the end of 2025” thanks to AI, and Zuckerberg remarked that AI might soon do the work of “midlevel” engineers​. These statements underline both the excitement and anxiety around AI coding. On the one hand, companies may become more productive with smaller teams as AI handles routine coding tasks. On the other hand, developers worry about job displacement or a shift in required skills. Quality control, architectural planning, and deep problem-solving could become more valued skills than churning out code. Some critics argue that we must be careful not to lose the “art” of programming. If vibe coding turns human programmers into mainly prompt-givers and code curators, the industry will need to adapt training and best practices to ensure we still cultivate talent who understand computing deeply. The consensus among many experts is that AI will augment engineers, not fully replace them – but those engineers will need to consciously avoid complacency and continue honing their craft while using AI tools.

Optimize Your Operations With AI Agents

Our AI agents streamline your workflows, unlocking new levels of business efficiency!

Explore Our AI Agents

Real-world applications and adoption

Vibe coding is not just a theoretical concept; it’s already being applied in various contexts, from hobby projects to startup products:

• Hobbyists and independent creators: Many individual developers and tinkerers have embraced vibe coding to build projects quickly. The vibe coding community has shared stories of creating apps in a single sitting using AI. A blogger demonstrated building the restaurant menu translator app in one night by chatting with an AI model through Cursor​. In another example, an enthusiast used vibe coding to create a web app for a DIY drawing robot by simply describing to the AI how the app should function​. These case studies show that a solo maker can achieve in hours what might have previously required a team or significantly more time. It’s a boon for prototyping new ideas, automating personal tasks, or just having fun building something without getting bogged down in syntax.

• Startups and rapid MVP development: Startups are leveraging vibe coding to accelerate the development of their minimum viable products (MVPs). For instance, Menlo Park Lab, a generative AI startup, uses vibe coding for its products. Founder Misbah Syed revealed he builds features by prompting the AI and feeding errors back to it; this approach powers Brainy Docs, which converts PDFs into explainer videos with slides. Even when the AI makes mistakes, “it usually fixes them” once errors are reintroduced, Syed says. This enables small startups to iterate faster and reach the market sooner. Similarly, many emerging tools aim to be the “Cursor for X.” At a recent AI Engineering Summit, developers were excited about applying vibe coding across various domains, such as website creation, game development, and data analysis. This trend is particularly beneficial for founders with domain expertise but limited coding skills, allowing them to translate their vision into software with minimal technical barriers.

• Enterprise and industry adoption: Vibe coding is gaining traction in formal enterprise environments. Developer platforms like Gitpod are integrating vibe coding into cloud development, aiming to bring it to enterprise teams. In this context, engineers could use AI agents to handle routine tickets or boilerplate tasks, allowing them to focus on critical architecture. Industries with less traditional software development culture are also eyeing these tools. In finance and accounting, for example, non-programmers could automate tasks by describing their needs to an AI assistant—potentially generating financial reports or real-time tax calculations. Similarly, in design and media, users could describe an interactive graphic or animation and have AI generate a draft. While still emerging, these applications empower professionals across fields, enabling them to create custom software or scripts without needing a developer.

• Education and learning: Interestingly, vibe coding is also finding a niche in programming education, albeit with some controversy. Tools like Replit’s Ghostwriter (AI coding assistant) have been used to help students or self-learners build projects quickly. The positive side is that it lets learners immediately realize ideas (keeping motivation high). A student can, for example, build a simple game by instructing the AI and then study the resulting code to understand how it works. However, educators caution that if overused, this might short-circuit the learning process. Some coding bootcamps and courses are beginning to incorporate AI pair programming as a skill, teaching new developers how to prompt and collaborate with AI effectively. The future developer might need to learn not only programming syntax, but also how to phrase requests to an AI to get the best results. This is becoming an emerging skill set in its own right.

The future of vibe coding

Vibe coding represents the next stage in software development, where AI plays a significant role in programming. As AI models improve, they will become even better at understanding context, optimizing code, and maintaining projects. However, developers must strike a balance—leveraging AI for efficiency while ensuring they retain the core knowledge needed to oversee and refine AI-generated solutions.

Vibe coding is paving the way for a future where “English becomes the hottest new programming language.” As AI coding systems like Cursor+Sonnet, Replit’s AI, and others continue to improve, we can expect the line between coder and non-coder to further blur. This approach is already empowering creatives, entrepreneurs, and engineers to build software with unprecedented speed and ease. It’s bringing a sense of “seamless creative flow” to programming in what some have dubbed the era of “vibeware” – software development tools that prioritize the creator’s experience and expression over low-level details​.

However, the rise of vibe coding also serves as a “vibe check” for the industry​. It challenges us to rethink education, best practices, and team workflows. In the near term, the most effective developers may be those who combine the best of both worlds: leveraging AI for speed and breadth while applying human judgment for depth, quality, and innovation. Companies and teams adopting vibe coding will likely develop new protocols – for example, requiring AI-generated code to undergo human review or training engineers to use AI as a brainstorming partner rather than an infallible authority.

Ultimately, vibe coding isn’t about replacing developers—it’s about amplifying their creativity and productivity. By embracing this new workflow, programmers can focus on innovation while letting AI handle the repetitive and time-consuming aspects of coding.

Final thoughts

Vibe coding is an exciting frontier in AI-assisted development. It entails a more fluid, conversational way of creating software that differs markedly from traditional hands-on coding. Vibe coding tools like Cursor Composer (with models such as Sonnet) exemplify how AI can generate, refine, and even debug code based on high-level prompts. The approach offers clear advantages in productivity, accessibility, and creative focus, enabling rapid prototyping and opening software creation to a wider audience. At the same time, it comes with limitations around reliability, code quality, and the learning curve (or lack thereof) for developers. Real-world adoption is already underway in startups, hobby projects, and even enterprise tooling, showing the method’s versatility. Yet, many experts voice cautions about over-reliance on AI for coding – highlighting risks like technical debt, lost expertise, and frustration when pushing beyond the AI’s capabilities.

Going forward, the key will be finding the right balance. AI-generated code can be amazingly powerful as a servant but potentially problematic as a master. By understanding both the promise and pitfalls of vibe coding, developers and organizations can harness its “vibes” productively while still keeping a critical eye on the code that results. The evolution of vibe coding will likely go hand-in-hand with improvements in AI and with new norms in the developer community. In the words of one optimist, “We’re witnessing the early days of a transformation” that could reshape creative and technical work across every industry​ – it’s up to us to guide that transformation responsibly.

From assessment to full-scale deployment, ZBrain simplifies AI adoption for every business function. Take the next step in AI transformation today!