Accuracy
TBD
Speed
TBD
Sample of data set required for Renewal Analytics and Feedback Agent:
Source Document: Aggregated Customer Feedback for ProjecTrac Q3 Renewal Campaign
Source Type: Internal Support Ticket Ticket ID: #8921-A4B8 Customer Name: Apex Solutions Date: 2023-10-26
Transcript:
Customer Support: Thank you for contacting InnovateCorp Support. How can I help you today?
Client (John Miller): Hi, we just received our renewal proposal for ProjecTrac. We're on the Business Tier, but the proposal mentions a price increase and a feature called "Advanced Analytics" that we weren't expecting. I'm having trouble seeing the justification for the new cost.
Customer Support: I can certainly clarify that. The "Advanced Analytics" module is now standard for the Business Tier, replacing the older reporting function. It provides much deeper insights.
Client (John Miller): I see. The embedded explainer video was helpful for a general overview, but it didn't cover the specifics of the Business Tier changes. We had to dig through the documentation to understand the value, which slowed down our internal approval process.
Customer Support: I appreciate that feedback, John. I will make a note for the renewals team to improve clarity on tier-specific changes in future proposals.
Source Type: External Review Platform (TrustRadius) Author: Sarah Jenkins, Project Manager Customer Name: Quantum Dynamics Date: 2023-10-24
Review Text:
We've been using ProjecTrac for three years and it's core to our workflow. The product itself is a 5/5. However, the renewal process feels very impersonal. We received a generic-looking email that almost got lost in my inbox. For a high-value account, I'd expect a more tailored approach. It feels too automated and lacks the personal touch our account manager usually provides. We love the service, but the renewal communication could be improved.
Source Type: Direct Email Feedback Sender: david.chen@horizonlogistics.com Customer Name: Horizon Logistics Date: 2023-10-27
Email Body:
Hi Renewals Team,
Just reviewed our proposal. Overall, the new interactive portal is a great improvement. The embedded FAQ section was particularly useful and answered most of our initial questions without needing to contact support.
One small piece of feedback: the link to view the full Master Service Agreement was formatted like normal text and we almost missed it. Making critical links like that more prominent, perhaps as a clear button, would be a helpful UX improvement.
Thanks, David Chen
Sample output delivered by the Renewal Analytics and Feedback Agent:
Renewal Campaign Analysis Report: ProjecTrac Q3
Generated: 2023-10-28 Analysis Period: Q3 2023 Renewal Campaign
1. Executive Summary
This report synthesizes customer feedback and proposal engagement data from the recent ProjecTrac Q3 renewal campaign. Key findings indicate positive reception to new interactive content but reveal critical opportunities for improvement in pricing clarity, communication personalization, and proposal design. Engagement metrics show a healthy interaction rate with embedded assets, though the initial email open rate is below target. Recommendations focus on refining proposal content and tailoring outreach to improve customer experience and renewal velocity.
2. Key Feedback Themes from Customer Communications
Analysis of unstructured feedback from support tickets, external reviews, and direct emails has identified three primary themes:
Pricing & Feature Justification:
Personalization of Outreach:
Proposal Content & Usability:
Engagement data collected from the proposal distribution platform provides the following performance overview:
| Metric | Value | Analysis |
|---|---|---|
| Email Open Rate | 48% | Below industry average; correlates with feedback on generic outreach. |
| Proposal View Rate | 92% | Strong performance; indicates that once opened, emails are effective. |
| Explainer Video Plays | 65% | High engagement, confirming video is a valued asset in the proposal. |
| Interactive FAQ Clicks | 71% | Excellent interaction rate, showing customers are using self-service tools. |
| Avg. Time to Decision | 11 Days | Higher than the 7-day target; likely impacted by delays in seeking clarity. |
Based on the combined feedback and engagement analysis, the following actions are recommended to optimize future renewal campaigns:
Enhance Pricing Transparency:
Increase Outreach Personalization:
Improve Proposal UI/UX:
Aggregates, standardizes, and validates subscription and contract data to maintain a unified, accurate renewal data foundation across the enterprise.
Automatically generates data-driven renewal proposals using customer insights, competitive intelligence, and predictive negotiation analysis.
Automates contract generation, validates terms against policy and regulatory standards, and flags anomalies for expert review to ensure fast, accurate, and compliant renewals at scale.
Automates validation of subscription activity against contract terms, delivering instant compliance alerts and reducing audit risk.
Transforms customer feedback and proposal engagement data into clear, actionable insights that strengthen renewal strategy and execution.
Synchronizes regulatory requirements and automates routing to ensure compliant renewal contract execution.