ZBrain
Log in
Book a demo
Book a demo
Agents Customer Feedback Insights Agent
Customer Feedback Insights Agent Icon

Customer Feedback Insights Agent

Aggregates and analyzes feedback from post-proposal engagements to inform ongoing account strategies and service improvements.

Capturing meaningful customer feedback in the account growth process is often fragmented, resulting in limited visibility into client sentiment and missed opportunities for continuous improvement. Post-proposal feedback, dispersed across emails, portals, and manual records, can be challenging to consolidate and interpret efficiently.

The Customer Feedback Insights Agent systematically monitors customer responses from various engagement channels, including emails, interactive portals, and structured feedback logs. It collects both qualitative and quantitative inputs, intelligently logs insights, and organizes them for seamless review by account teams. By connecting to sources such as customer feedback submissions, engagement analytics, response threads, and portal data, the agent provides a unified feedback view to guide future engagement strategies and proposal refinement.

This capability supports higher customer satisfaction and increased process productivity by enabling swift identification of improvement areas and rapidly adapting account approaches based on real customer data. Teams are empowered to continuously enhance their upselling and cross-selling practices, driving better business outcomes and deeper client relationships.

Accuracy
TBD

Speed
TBD

Input Data Set

Sample of data set required for Customer Feedback Insights Agent:

Source Document ID: Feedback-Log-INV8439
Client: Quantum Dynamics
Proposal ID: QD-2024-0012
Date Range: 2024-10-26 to 2024-10-28


FEEDBACK SOURCE 1: EMAIL THREAD
From: sarah.jenkins@quantumdynamics.com
To: mark.reynolds@innovatecorp.com
Subject: Re: Following up on your proposal for Project Atlas


Hi Mark,


Thanks for sending over the proposal. The team and I have reviewed it and are generally impressed with the scope of the AI-driven workflow automation. The user interface mockups look very clean.


We do have a few questions, particularly around the tiered pricing structure for the 'Enterprise+' plan. It's not immediately clear what the API call limits are for that tier and how the overage charges are calculated. Can you provide more detail on that?


Also, the implementation timeline seems aggressive. Our internal IT team has a change freeze in Q1, so a January start date would be problematic. We need to understand if there is flexibility on the deployment schedule.


Best,
Sarah Jenkins
VP of Operations, Quantum Dynamics




FEEDBACK SOURCE 2: CUSTOMER PORTAL SUBMISSION
Submission ID: PORTAL-FB-6172B
Submitted By: sarah.jenkins@quantumdynamics.com
Proposal Clarity Rating: 4/5
Value Proposition Rating: 5/5
Pricing Competitiveness Rating: 3/5


Qualitative Feedback:
"The proposed solution aligns well with our strategic goals for improving operational efficiency. The feature set, especially the predictive analytics module, is a key differentiator. My main concern is with the pricing model; it feels a bit complex compared to other vendors we've evaluated. A simplified, flat-rate option would be more appealing. Additionally, we would require a dedicated support contact for the first six months post-launch, which wasn't explicitly mentioned in the support package details."

Deliverable Example

Sample output delivered by the Customer Feedback Insights Agent:

Customer Feedback Analysis Report


Client: Quantum Dynamics
Proposal ID: QD-2024-0012
Analysis Date: 2024-10-29




1. Overall Sentiment


Sentiment: Mixed with Positive Intent


The feedback indicates strong interest in the core solution and its features, but raises significant concerns regarding pricing complexity and implementation logistics that need to be addressed before moving forward.


2. Key Feedback Summary


    

  • Positive Alignment: The client is impressed with the proposed AI workflow automation, UI design, and the strategic value of the predictive analytics module.
    • 

  • Pricing Concerns: The tiered pricing for the 'Enterprise+' plan is unclear and perceived as complex. The client expressed a preference for a simpler, potentially flat-rate model.
    • 

  • Implementation Timeline: The proposed January start date conflicts with the client's internal IT change freeze in Q1. Flexibility is required.
    • 

  • Support Requirements: A dedicated support contact for the initial six months post-launch is a key requirement not addressed in the proposal.
    • 

  • Technical Query: Specific details on API call limits and overage charge calculations are needed.
    • 



3. Categorized Insights






Category
Source
Insight
Required Action






Commercials
Email & Portal
Pricing model is complex and unclear; competitiveness is a concern (rated 3/5).
Prepare a revised pricing addendum with a simplified option and clear API limit/overage details.




Implementation
Email
Proposed timeline conflicts with client's internal change freeze.
Consult with the delivery team to propose a revised Q2 deployment schedule.




Product & Features
Portal & Email
Core feature set and UI are highly valued. Predictive analytics is a key differentiator.
Reinforce the value of these features in the next communication.




**Support &




Service**
Portal
Client requires a dedicated support contact for the first 6 months.
Review the standard support package and cost out a 'Dedicated Support' option.






4. Recommended Next Steps


    

  1. Draft Follow-Up Email: Prepare a response for Account Manager Mark Reynolds to send to Sarah Jenkins.
    2. 

  2. Clarify Pricing: Attach a one-page document that clearly explains the 'Enterprise+' tier, including API limits, overage costs, and a new, simplified alternative pricing structure.
    3. 

  3. Propose New Timeline: Offer a revised project plan with a flexible start date in early Q2 to accommodate their IT freeze.
    4. 

  4. Address Support: Confirm that a dedicated support contact can be provided and include details in the follow-up.
    5. 

  5. Schedule Meeting: Propose a brief follow-up call to walk through the clarifications and answer any remaining questions.
    6.

Related Agents

Customer Feedback Insights Agent

Aggregates and analyzes feedback from post-proposal engagements to inform ongoing account strategies and service improvements.

Trade Management Assurance Agent

Orchestrates guided trade intake, data extraction, auto-population, and real-time validation for accurate, efficient trade management.

Trade Execution Readiness Agent

Validates trade approvals and policy compliance using LLM intelligence, and sends real-time email alerts when a trade is ready or requires action.

Regulatory Compliance Assurance Agent

Evaluates strategy documents and scenario plans against current regulatory and policy requirements to ensure compliance before approval.

Customer Needs Intelligence Agent

Aggregates, analyzes, and identifies customer needs to flag churn risks and upsell opportunities for timely, targeted engagement.

Renewal Risk Prioritization Agent

Analyzes expiring licenses and evaluates renewal risk to generate prioritized action lists for account teams.