Source Document ID: Feedback-Log-INV8439
Client: Quantum Dynamics
Proposal ID: QD-2024-0012
Date Range: 2024-10-26 to 2024-10-28
FEEDBACK SOURCE 1: EMAIL THREAD
From: sarah.jenkins@quantumdynamics.com
To: mark.reynolds@innovatecorp.com
Subject: Re: Following up on your proposal for Project Atlas
Hi Mark,
Thanks for sending over the proposal. The team and I have reviewed it and are generally impressed with the scope of the AI-driven workflow automation. The user interface mockups look very clean.
We do have a few questions, particularly around the tiered pricing structure for the 'Enterprise+' plan. It's not immediately clear what the API call limits are for that tier and how the overage charges are calculated. Can you provide more detail on that?
Also, the implementation timeline seems aggressive. Our internal IT team has a change freeze in Q1, so a January start date would be problematic. We need to understand if there is flexibility on the deployment schedule.
Best,
Sarah Jenkins
VP of Operations, Quantum Dynamics
FEEDBACK SOURCE 2: CUSTOMER PORTAL SUBMISSION
Submission ID: PORTAL-FB-6172B
Submitted By: sarah.jenkins@quantumdynamics.com
Proposal Clarity Rating: 4/5
Value Proposition Rating: 5/5
Pricing Competitiveness Rating: 3/5
Qualitative Feedback:
"The proposed solution aligns well with our strategic goals for improving operational efficiency. The feature set, especially the predictive analytics module, is a key differentiator. My main concern is with the pricing model; it feels a bit complex compared to other vendors we've evaluated. A simplified, flat-rate option would be more appealing. Additionally, we would require a dedicated support contact for the first six months post-launch, which wasn't explicitly mentioned in the support package details."